Business Categories Reports Podcasts Events Awards Webinars
Contact My Account About
Member Exclusive

Too Important for Shortcuts: The Brands Fighting for Women’s Health

Published April 6, 2025
Published April 6, 2025
Ovii

From social media censorship to struggles in securing funding for femtech brands, operating a consumer brand aimed at women’s health concerns like fertility and hormonal health is not an easy feat. Especially as residing in the grey space between a medical and cosmetic product comes with claim, testing, and marketing challenges. Amid Trump’s takeover, the concerns for women’s reproductive rights and freedoms have reached a fever pitch. In an attempt to ban “woke” initiatives, the Trump administration banned almost 200 words, including “female,” “people + uterus,” “women,” and “pregnant person” from public-facing websites or school curricula according toThe New York Times. Some words were outright banned, while others were advised to be used with caution. Furthermore, with only 4% of healthcare research and development dedicated towards women’s health issues, the average endometriosis diagnosis taking 7.5 years, and one in six experiencing infertility worldwide, solutions are more vital than ever. In a study by McKinsey & Co., 64% of medical interventions studied put women at a disadvantage due to limited access, lower efficacy, or a combination of both. Women weren’t included in medical trials until 1993. In 2016, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandated that studies mark sex as a biological variable, but there were no consequences if this wasn’t reinforced. Five years later, there still wasn’t an equal amount of male-to-female comparisons in pre-clinical studies.

You've reached your limit.

Want to continue reading this article and others just like it?

Subscribe to BeautyMatter and access the most current beauty intelligence and news updates.

Subscribe

Already a member, login here.